Programme
Young Makers in the Docks
Six sessions in Newham for Years 4 to 6 and their families: a Saturday at UEL Docklands, four Thursdays after school at Gallions Primary, and a Saturday showcase back at UEL.
26 Sep – 24 Oct
the programme
2026. Two Saturdays and four Thursdays.
6
sessions
Two family sessions of two hours, four after-school hours.
2
venues
UEL Docklands, and Gallions Primary School in Newham.
16
children at the club
Years 4 to 6. The two Saturdays at UEL take more.
2
facilitators
iOi staff, DBS checked. UEL students volunteer alongside them, never alone with children.
200
people promised
At least 100 children and as many parents and carers, all Royal Docks residents.
The shape of it
-
Tue 1 Sep
One flyer, with all the information, to GallionsBisi asked for a single flyer she can share with parents and carers, by the morning. The board splits it into three and dates the first the 2nd.
-
Fri 4 Sep
Flyers for the workshops and the show and tellTraining objectives agreed with UEL. Evaluation planned.
-
Fri 11 Sep
Materials list, and materials boughtThe co-design tasters only. The club’s own materials cannot be known yet.
-
Sat 26 Sep
Co-design session · UEL DocklandsTwo hours, 12:00 to 14:00, offered to Bisi and not yet answered. Children with a parent or carer. Three short makes, and what the children take to tells us which track to run.
-
Sun 27 – Wed 30 Sep
Five days to buy for the track we pickThe co-design on the Saturday is what we pick it from. The club starts on the Thursday.
-
Thu 1 Oct
Workshop 1 · Gallions Primary15:25 to 16:25, the slot Bisi proposed.
-
Thu 8 Oct
Workshop 2 · Gallions Primary15:25 to 16:25.
-
Thu 15 Oct
Workshop 3 · Gallions Primary15:25 to 16:25. Build starts.
-
Thu 22 Oct
Workshop 4 · Gallions Primary15:25 to 16:25. Build finishes.
-
Sat 24 Oct
Show and tell · UEL DocklandsTwo hours. Exhibition and a panel. Not on the ground floor: UEL has another event there.
-
Mon 26 – Fri 30 Oct
Newham half termThe showcase sits on the Saturday before it.
-
Fri 30 Oct
Hugo Burge Foundation decision expectedIf it lands, four more sessions and a December showcase, 5 or 12 December.
Materials are delivered in bulk to Gallions and stored there. That assumption is what pays for the reduced travel and courier line.
The reach we are committed to
These are the numbers the funding was asked for on. The left column is what the application promised Royal Docks Trust. The middle is what the programme as booked actually reaches.
| Promised to Royal Docks Trust | The booked programme | What it turns on |
| 200 people in all | | Falls out of the four rows below, once the two Saturdays have a capacity |
| At least 100 children | | The club is 16. The rest has to come from the two Saturdays at UEL |
| A similar number of parents and carers | | Both Saturdays are family sessions, so adults come with children |
| 40 children and 40 adults at the co-design | | Whether the co-design is open to the year group or only to the 16 club families |
| 20 to 40 children per after-school session | 16 | Short of the floor by 4. 16 is what the school and our own planning both say |
| At least 40 at the celebration | | UEL capacity for 24 October, which is off the ground floor and not yet booked |
| 100 Imagination Boxes home with families | 0 | Cut from the budget. Still promised on two slides of the deck that goes to schools |
| All 200 Royal Docks area residents | | Whether Gallions’ catchment counts as the Royal Docks area for the funder |
How the impact gets evidenced
Creativity
measure
A children’s version of the Harvard Divergent Association Task, run as a baseline and again at the end.
The eight competencies
measure
Ken Robinson’s frame: collaboration, composure, citizenship, compassion, communication, creativity, criticism, curiosity.
Attendance
measure
Session by session. It is also the only measure that tells us early whether the reach numbers are going to land.
Voice
measure
Surveys and interviews with children and with parents, baseline and follow-up. Net promoter scores. Career aspirations.
Every one of these needs a baseline, and the first session families attend is the co-design on 26 September. The evaluation plan is dated 4 September and is not yet written.
Stakeholders
- funder
- venue and partner
- delivery school
- delivery
- introduced it
Royal Docks Trust
funder
Main Programme Funding 2026/2027. The programme is free to the school and to families.
What is agreed
- Applied 30 March 2026 · £20,436 requested, no match funding.
- The budget now stands at £15,000 · the reduction is recorded line by line, but not who required it, and no source ties the award to either column.
- Beneficiaries promised · 200 people, at least 100 children and a similar number of parents and carers, all Royal Docks residents.
ContactJohn
Awardconfirmed
Amount
University of East London
venue and partner
Docklands Campus hosts both Saturdays and supplies MSc student volunteers.
What they give, what they need
- Space, assumed free · the budget says so in writing. If it is not free, venue hire has to be added.
- The Maker Space · 3D printers and laser cutters named as kit the children could reach.
- MSc students as volunteers · near-peer role models, recruited locally. No DBS: they are always beside a DBS-checked iOi facilitator and never alone with children.
- The RDCS booking form · UEL needs it returned to log the booking and capture what each session needs. Not returned yet.
- They want more than a venue role · Kiran has asked for longer-term collaboration, research and openings for UEL staff, students and community. Nothing concrete agreed.
BookingsJameelah
AcademicKiran, and Graham who introduced it
Gallions Primary School
delivery school
Newham. The four after-school workshops, and the storage for the materials.
What is agreed
- Dates confirmed · four weekly Thursdays, 15:25 to 16:25.
- 460 pupils · academy converter, with resourced provision for autistic children.
- Storage on site · materials go in bulk and stay there between sessions.
- Owed the full plan · promised at the beginning of September, with the three flyers.
ContactBisi
Children16, Years 4 to 6
Institute of Imagination
delivery
Designs and runs every session, and designs the training for the UEL students.
What we carry
- The risk assessments · ours, for both venues.
- DBS-checked facilitators · two at the after-school club, with student volunteers alongside.
- The student training · objectives and placement still to agree with UEL.
- An introduction owed · we said we would connect UEL to the other Newham schools we work with, so something outlasts these six sessions.
ProgrammeLiber
PartnersMuireann
Newham Council
introduced it
Circulated the offer to schools near UEL Docklands, which is how Gallions came in.
Stratford Library
ContactSelena
Rolebroker, not delivery
Hugo Burge Foundation
funder not secured
An extension, if it lands: four more sessions and a showcase in December.
applied 31 July 2026
Decision by30 October
Odds last year1.07%
The four pathways
We choose the track, informed by what the families do. The co-design session on 26 September runs three short makes as a test ground, and what the children engage with is the input. The decision is ours, and it is made after the Saturday. Nobody outside iOi knows the tracks exist, so nothing a family reads offers a menu, and none of it uses the word track. All four tracks end the same way, with an exhibition and a panel at the show and tell.
Cardboard Lab
pathway
Techniques, then forms, then build.
The four sessions
- Taster · build a cube from cardboard and plastic screws.
- Session 1 · cardboard techniques: connections, and decorative.
- Session 2 · 3D shapes: cube, pyramid, cylinder, cone, sphere, geodesic dome.
- Sessions 3 and 4 · design and build. A 3D structure.
Carry-forwardstrong
Best forlow cost, easiest to run, widest ages
Motion Lab
pathway
Parts, then power, then build.
The four sessions
- Taster · a marble run, or a matchbox automaton.
- Session 1 · moving parts: simple machines and mechanisms, force helpers and motion converters.
- Session 2 · what makes it go: rubber bands, inclined planes, sand, your hand.
- Sessions 3 and 4 · design and build. A marble run, an automaton or a pinball machine.
Carry-forwardstrong
Best forbroad appeal, hands-on throughout
Drawing Robots Lab
pathway
More control each week, then build.
The four sessions
- Taster · a scribble bot.
- Session 1 · Cubetto.
- Session 2 · Kitronik Simple Robotics Kit for the BBC micro:bit, or the nearest kit we hold.
- Sessions 3 and 4 · design and build. Robot art.
Carry-forwardlight, fresh kit each week
Best forcoding focus, visible results on paper
Robot Lab
pathway
Upgrade the machine each week, then build.
The four sessions
- Taster · an elastic band car.
- Session 1 · make it roll, give it an engine.
- Session 2 · give it a brain.
- Sessions 3 and 4 · design and build. A robot vehicle, or a walking robot.
Carry-forwardstrong, one machine throughout
Best fora clear story, lively showcase
Two of the four labs run on kit, and kit is not bought. iOi owns its tools and they are within budget, so the question on the drawing robots and the robots is whether we hold enough Cubetto, Ozobots or Kitronik micro:bit kits for 16 children, not what £834 can buy. The materials line is consumables, for the whole programme, and cardboard is the board’s own “low cost” option. The board’s hedge “or whatever we have that’s similar” is the only place any source says what we hold.
The pedagogy is Ken Robinson’s eight core competencies, and the measure of creativity is a children’s version of the Harvard Divergent Association Task, run as a baseline and a follow-up.
The budget
Applied for, and what the programme now runs on
| Line | Applied for | Budget | What changed |
| Salaries | 8,500 | 7,089 | Six school sessions became four |
| Employer’s NI | 1,220 | 1,017 | Follows the salaries |
| Pensions | 210 | 175 | Follows the salaries |
| Staff, sub total | 9,930 | 8,282 | |
| Materials, building and making | 1,000 | 834 | Six school sessions became four |
| Imagination Boxes × 100 | 1,500 | | Cut. No free takeaway pack for families |
| Travel and courier | 420 | 350 | Delivered in bulk and stored at the school |
| Volunteer travel and subsistence | 420 | 300 | Activities simplified, so fewer volunteers |
| Marketing | 2,500 | 1,343 | Promoted through the school instead |
| Monitoring and evaluation | 2,000 | 1,668 | Six school sessions became four |
| Admin and overheads 15% | 2,666 | 2,223 | Follows the total |
| Running, sub total | 10,506 | 6,718 | |
| Total | 20,436 | 15,000 | |
Every line marked as a session cut is the original × 0.834. Four sixths would be 0.667. 0.834 is the factor that lands the total on exactly £15,000, so the reduced budget is a target distributed backwards, not a costing. The £834 materials line was never priced against a pathway.
The budget assumes UEL gives the space free. It says so in writing. If that turns out not to be true, venue hire has to come from somewhere, and there is no match funding.
Where the sources disagree
- Six sessions, or four. The budget cuts every line “from 6 to 4 sessions”, while the programme now booked has six events: four at the school and two at UEL. Whether the offer’s “six-session programme” ever meant six school sessions is not settled in any source.
- The Imagination Boxes. The deck sent to schools promises every family takes one home, and the application budgets £1,500 for a hundred. The reduced budget removes the line entirely. The deck is out of date against the money.
- How many children. The application expects 40 children and 40 adults at the co-design, 20 to 40 children per after-school session and 200 people in all. The planning board and Liber’s own email say 16 children at the club. Both figures sit on the board together.
- How long the UEL Saturdays run. The board says one hour, 12:00 to 13:00. The email to Gallions the same day says two hours, 12:00 to 14:00, and it is the later of the two, so the flyer carries two hours and the board is what needs correcting.
- When the co-design happens. The application places it in the summer holiday, and rests its accessibility answer on that. It is booked for a Saturday in term time.
- What the tasters actually are. The board’s co-design row lists a cardboard cube, a marble run, a scribble bot and an elastic band car. The deck sent to schools says the tasters are “coding LEGO vehicles and junk modelling”, neither of which appears on the board.
- The showcase and half term. The application and the deck both put the celebration in October half term. The booked date, Saturday 24 October, is the Saturday before half term starts.
What this record still needs
- Which three makes go on the table. Three is settled and four tracks are designed, so one lab has no make at the co-design.
- How the club’s materials get bought in five days. The board dates the materials list and the purchase 11 September, a fortnight before the co-design that the track is chosen from. The 11 September buy can only cover the tasters. Whatever the club needs has to be found between the Saturday and the Thursday.
- Where the other 84 children come from. The application promises at least 100 and the club holds 16. Only the two Saturdays can close that, and neither room is booked.
- The figure the award was made at, and its conditions, including whether the Trust must be credited. The award itself is confirmed; every source predates it and holds the application rather than the outcome.
- The UEL rooms. No room, floor or capacity for either Saturday, and the RDCS booking form is not returned. All that is known is that the showcase is off the ground floor.
- The UEL students. How many volunteer, on which sessions, and when their training runs.
- A nod on the after-school time. 15:25 to 16:25 is Bisi’s own proposal, but she made it against a fortnightly date set that was dropped and has not restated it for the four booked Thursdays.
- The evaluation plan. Owned, dated 4 September, not written.
- A promise tighter than our own rule. UEL were told their students are always beside a DBS-checked facilitator and never alone with children.
DECISIONS.md lets a volunteer hold a station alone in a shared room. Whichever stands, both sides should be told the same thing.
- “Simplify activities so fewer volunteers are required” is the stated reason for cutting the volunteer line to £300. Nothing else in the sources says the activities must be simplified.